Sunday, November 22, 2009

Opinion

Robert Schlesinger

Baseball Must Expand Instant Replay

October 30, 2009 12:26 PM ET | Robert Schlesinger | Permanent Link | Print

By Robert Schlesinger, Thomas Jefferson Street blog

What will it take for baseball to expand its instant replay system? A series of umpiring blunders in the post-season? Been there: There was Joe Mauer's "foul" ball down the left field line in the ALDS ... the botched double-play benefiting the Yankees in the ALCS ... in the same series, there was Yankees outfielder Nick Swisher incorrectly called safe on a pick-off attempt and then incorrectly being called out after tagging up and scoring on a fly ball—all in the same inning. There are other examples from preliminary playoff rounds.

Blown calls potentially affecting the outcome of the World Series itself? Done that. In a tight second game on Thursday night, umpires managed a blunder double-play, killing two late-inning rallies in a tight game. In the championship series.

If you didn't watch the game and haven't seen the replays: In the bottom the 7th inning, the Yankees had runners on first and second with one out. Outfielder Johnny Damon hit a sharp liner at the Phillies first baseman Ryan Howard, who snagged the ball at ground level and turned to throw to second base in order to cut down the lead runner. Note that Howard (who would later be evasive about whether he had caught the ball on the fly) reacted as if he had caught the ball on a hop; had he caught it on the fly he would have trotted over first base for the double-play. Howard threw wide, apparently giving the Yankees bases loaded with one out—but the first base umpire, who was standing behind Howard and in foul territory, thought the Phillie caught the ball on the fly and called it an inning-ending double play.

In the very next half-inning, with Phillies on first and second and one out, Mariano Rivera induced a grounder to second that appeared to result in an inning-ending second-to-short-to-first double play. But instant replays showed, again, that the first base umpire had blown the call; the batter beat the throw and the Phillies should have had first and third with two outs.

You can see both plays here (you'll note that MLB.com's video department says that "replays show" the plays "were not actually double plays").

Both plays were bang-bang plays. Any umpire could have gotten either or both wrong.

And that's why we need to expand instant replay: because people get things wrong. I think the overwhelming majority of baseball fans would like the World Series to be decided by the players on the field, not the umpires.

Instant replay opponents argue that human error is part of the game. And it is, but that's like arguing that grass and dirt are part of the game, so there's no need for grounds crews. Baseball should strive for the game's only errors to be a dropped balls and hanging curves—again, let the players make the errors, not the umps.

Critics argue that expanding instant replay would slow the game down. So do arguments after close calls; and so do the umpires huddling together to confer on a call, which they do now. And really what's an extra minute or two if it means getting the call right? (Here's the dirty secret about baseball: The pauses and plodding rhythm that can make it somewhat boring in April only serve to heighten tension and drama in October.)

Baseball has a rich tradition of tradition. Huge swathes of fans oppose innovations—the designated hitter rule, free agency, inter-league play, expanded playoffs—simply because that's not how it's been done in the past. And many times those traditionalists are right. But this is a case where tradition is the enemy of the game.

Commissioner Bud Selig talked to the media before Thursday night's game and reiterated his opposition to expanding the use of instant replay. Maybe last night's blown calls will change his mind. Or maybe he has to wait until a game—perhaps the series—is affirmatively decided on a blown call.

We've got up to five more chances; maybe this will be the year.

(Oh and: Go Yankees!)

Tags: sports | baseball | MLB

Tools: Share | | Comments (4) | Print

Reader Comments

Disagree

Mr. Schlesinger,

There is something you're missing: throughout history, a baseball team's success can be attributed to good fundamentals (i.e. pitching, hitting and fielding) but also how adept it is at cheating. If you haven't already, read Derek Zumsteg's The Cheater's Guide to Baseball. It's a really fun book, but also makes a great point: "cheating-within reason-is not only not a bad thing, it actually makes baseball a more nuanced game." Zumsteg probably uses the word "cheat" to get more attention, but the point is that baseball has a long, glorious history of players and managers bending rules as far as they can for competitive advantage. If you take the human element out of the game by using technology you take away part of the heart of the game. After a botched call, Earl Weaver calling a computer's mother a lying, scheming you-know-what just wouldn't have the same effect.

umps

Jon of Tx... I remember a world series years ago, I think the Braves were playing, when the home plate umpire was making wildly wrong ball/strike calls... abysmally bad. He went on through the 5th inning or so , when I believe he removed himself from the game... claims he had something wrong with his eyes. Turns out he couldn't see squat the entire game! I think there should be an appeal of some sort in a case like this... the man was calling strikes for Maddox 8 inches outside. Perhaps something like removing the ump if he makes 3 or so obvious, terrible calls. At any rate, it's just odd that baseball is so slow to allow replay, as if bad calls are just an accepted thing, like it will all even out. Well, it won't even out if the fix is in, and that is something that could be minimixed with replay.

baseball

I agree somewhat with Todd of PA. There might be room for IP in some areas, but never base-running or balls and strikes. With the home run cam I could also see the fair ball/foul ball instant replay come into the game.

Add your thoughts

Your comment will be posted immediately, unless it is spam or contains profanity. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

advertisement

U.S. News Weekly

Subscribe Now

Order the new U.S. News Weekly digital magazine at a special low introductory price!

Robert Schlesinger is a deputy editor at U.S. News and World Report and oversees all opinion editorial content. He is the author of White House Ghosts: Presidents and Their Speechwriters.

advertisement

NEWSLETTER

Sign up today for the latest headlines from U.S. News & World Report delivered to you free.

RSS FEEDS

Personalize your U.S. News with our feeds of blogs and breaking news headlines.

U.S. NEWS MOBILE

U.S. News daily briefings are also available on your mobile device.

People who read this also read ...

Thomas Jefferson St.

Healthcare Deals Hurt Middle Class

Lawmakers' votes should not be based on the government equivalent of a bribe.

It's Not About Race, Jesse

With a changing African-American electorate, Jesse Jackson's comments can be overlooked.

GOP Aims at Moderate Dems

Votes in favor of healthcare might hurt more moderate Democrats.

Sarah Palin's a Quitter and a Whiner

A 20-city book tour and an appearance on Oprah hardly qualify as public service.

The President and the Rogue

They're about as far apart as the states that produced them.

Jobs Take Back Seat to Healthcare

Try as she might, Pelosi can't change the subject that fast.

Women Still Need Mammograms

Is this the start of rationing healthcare coverage?

The Scope of the House Healthcare Abortion Ba

Stupak-Pitts Amendment would be far-reaching.

Cartoon Gallery

Editorial Cartoon

Political Cartoons

Check out our most recent cartoons.

Public Opinion

Should the FCC Regulate Web Fair Play?

The government may step in to prevent traffic-speed shenanigans.

Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of our Terms and Conditions of Use and Privacy Policy.
Make USNews.com your home page.