Capital Commerce

One Sign America Is Not in Decline

By Matthew Bandyk

Posted: October 27, 2009

You should definitely check out my colleague Rick Newman's 9 Signs of America in Decline. He combines together some different thought-provoking data that make up for a very worrisome whole. But I do have one comment to make on one of his signs that might make the overall picture not look as bad.

Poverty. The U.S. poverty rate, about 17 percent, is third worst among the advanced nations tracked by the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. In that sample, only Turkey and Mexico are worse.

That's completely true. But there's "poverty" and then there's what we normally think of when we think about being poor and its impact on quality of life. The fact that there are more people living "in poverty" in the United States than in most advanced nations does not mean that the U.S. has more poor people than most of those countries.

Poverty is a relative concept. Specifically, the OECD defines it as less than one half of the nation's median household income. Because that income is so high in the U.S., people who would be rich if they lived in Turkey or Mexico could be considered impoverished in America.

When we look at standard of living on an absolute basis, the U.S. fares much better.

The OECD's data on national income per capita (adjusted for purchasing power parity) places the U.S. at third-highest in the world, behind only Luxembourg and Norway, and ahead of Switzerland. The U.S. has consistently maintained this ranking over several years.

But the OECD's numbers come from 2007. The recession, of course, is going to make the U.S. poorer in an absolute sense. But will it lose that high ranking compared to the rest of the world?

It seems unlikely.  The IMF's projection of GDP per capita PPP in 2010 has the U.S. as the fifth-highest in the world, after only Qatar, Luxembourg, Norway and Brunei, and ahead of Singapore, Hong Kong and Switzerland.

Plus, democratic values are spreading

Remember that as more nations become democratic, they tend to trade peacefully, rather than go to war.

Global violence, despite the Iraq and Afghanistan battles, as well as tensions in various other regions, seems to be generally on a downward trajectory.

At least the world is working together to keep those values of freedom, peace, and prosperity alive, as more nations become democratic.

The more similar "friends" throughout the word, the less the US has to rigidly attempt to remain a superpower to survive. We could end up similar to many "peer" nations, in which case we won't need to feel so much need to maintain dominance, because there are simply fewer threats out there.

A more peaceful world with democratic values.

Not a bad scenario, is it?

Nope.

Looking On the Bright Side of IL @ Oct 29, 2009 01:44:30 AM

Bubble

Thanks for pointing this out. We (Americans) tend to forget that our wealth is the exception not the rule in comparison to other countries. Most of us have no concept of what "poor" is in other countries. A lot of us live in a bubble with luxuries that we think are necessities. I am not trying to say that loss is not painful, but if we looked out side of our padded shell once in a while we may not complain so much.

Tina of TN @ Oct 28, 2009 23:24:24 PM

Add Your Thoughts
About You

advertisement

Capital Commerce

Capital Commerce

U.S. News business reporter Matthew Bandyk examines the issues, people, and debates that shape the nexus of political and economic life in the nation's capital.

advertisement

advertisement

Subscribe

U.S. News Digital Weekly

A weekly insider's guide to politics and policy — in a multimedia, digital format. 52 issues for $19.95!

U.S. News & World Report

6 months of U.S. News & World Report's print edition for only $15. Save up to 67% off the cover price!